Board and governance
Governance documents are easy to write and hard to evidence. Each tool here asks the follow-up question an auditor or regulator would ask, so a "yes" only counts when it would hold up. Several print a register or a board pack you can table at the next meeting.
Usually opened by Directors, audit and risk committees, CROs and compliance leads.
9 tools in this group, all free with a printable result
Combined reportCombined AI Governance Board PackGather the results you have already saved in the board oversight, ISO 42001, agent risk and technology risk tools into one printable board pack, with the questions to put to management and the evidence to ask for. Nothing leaves your browser.- Checklist
Board AI Oversight Checklist
Is our board actually overseeing AI, or just receiving updates about it?
- When to use it
- Ahead of a board or audit committee session on AI.
- What you get
- An oversight score across six areas, with the probes behind each answer.
- Effort
- 23 questions, 69 follow-up probes
- Last updated
- 30 Sept 2026
- Checklist
Technology Risk Board Pack
Could our bank answer the questions MAS put to DBS in 2023?
- When to use it
- For bank boards and technology risk committees, before the regulator asks.
- What you get
- A printable board pack: the evidence to request and the MAS, PRA, DORA, APRA, HKMA or Basel rule behind each gap.
- Effort
- 20 questions, about 8 minutes
- Last updated
- 12 Oct 2026
- Checklist
ISO 42001 AIMS Readiness Checklist
How far are we from passing an ISO/IEC 42001 audit?
- When to use it
- When certification is on the plan, or a client has started asking for it.
- What you get
- A live readiness score across all seven clauses and 103 evidence checks.
- Effort
- 36 requirements
- Last updated
- 30 Sept 2026
- Calculator
ISO/IEC 42001 Clause Readiness Calculator
Which clauses would an auditor grade as a nonconformity, and are we ready to book Stage 1?
- When to use it
- When certification has a date, and you need to know what to fix first.
- What you get
- A maturity score for each clause, likely major and minor findings, Stage 1 and Stage 2 blockers, and a draft Statement of Applicability for all 38 Annex A controls.
- Effort
- 27 ratings and 38 control decisions
- Last updated
- 29 Oct 2026
- Assessment
EU AI Act Risk Classifier
Does the EU AI Act apply to this AI system, and what does it require of us?
- When to use it
- Before an AI system reaches EU customers, or when its output is used in the EU from outside it.
- What you get
- The risk class, your role, each obligation with its article, and the dates that apply after the July 2026 Omnibus.
- Effort
- Up to 11 questions, about 5 minutes
- Last updated
- 25 Oct 2026
- Assessment
Agent Risk Assessment Matrix
How much oversight does each of our AI agents need?
- When to use it
- Before an agent goes live, or when you need a register of the ones already running.
- What you get
- An oversight tier per agent, the controls it requires and the ISO 42001 clause each satisfies, printed as a register.
- Effort
- 8 questions per agent
- Last updated
- 17 Sept 2026
- Calculator
Oversight Ceiling Calculator
How much AI output can go out unreviewed before our quality promise breaks?
- When to use it
- When someone proposes cutting human review to save cost.
- What you get
- The largest safe unreviewed share, the reviewers it takes, and what model correlation costs you.
- Effort
- 10 inputs from your own records
- Last updated
- 1 Oct 2026
- Assessment
Public Sector Algorithmic Impact Assessment
What impact level is this government AI system, and which safeguards does that level require?
- When to use it
- At the concept stage of an automated-decision system, before the business case or the approval meeting.
- What you get
- An impact level from I to IV, the safeguards that level requires, the gaps in your design, and a cross-walk to Canadian, Australian, UK, Singapore and OECD frameworks.
- Effort
- 12 questions, about 10 minutes
- Last updated
- 25 Oct 2026
- Dashboard
AI Trust, Risk and Governance Dashboard
Are our live systems fair, traceable and secure?
- When to use it
- When AI is in production and the risk team needs one place to monitor it.
- What you get
- Bias and fairness, data lineage, OWASP LLM threats and RAG access-control posture against benchmark thresholds.
- Effort
- Adjust the inputs to your systems
- Last updated
- 17 Sept 2026
Other groups
- Where you standScore your organisation and rank your use cases before any budget is committed.
- Value and ROIModel the return before you build, then measure the return you are getting.
- Agent labsCheck the task suits an agent, then build one in your browser and test it against real launch standards.
- Build, buy and runChoose the vendor, the contract and the data foundation, then keep the system healthy.
- ReferenceThe frameworks, patterns and rubrics behind every tool above.
Work through it together
The workshop turns these diagnostics into a half-day session with a benchmarked scorecard and roadmap. Or book a private session on your specific situation.

A board doesn't need to understand the model. It needs to know who answers for it and what evidence sits behind each yes. These tools ask those questions for you.










