Build, buy, or partner?
Seven inputs covering your use case, data sensitivity, team capability, and timeline. A weighted algorithm returns a clear recommendation with rationale and risk flags.
Listen to this briefing
The AI Build, Buy, or Partner Tool
Your Decision Inputs
How unique or proprietary is this AI use case to your business?
How sensitive is the data this AI system will process?
How strong is your internal AI and technical delivery team?
What is your implementation and first-year operating budget?
How quickly do you need to be live and delivering value?
Is this AI capability a genuine competitive differentiator for your business?
How willing is your organisation to own and maintain this solution long-term?
Your Recommendation
Vendor Partnership / Systems Integrator
Bring in an experienced implementation partner who can move quickly while you retain strategic ownership and control of the outcome.
Key factors driving this recommendation
- Moderate use case specificity: standard approaches will cover most requirements
- External expertise reduces delivery risk when internal capability is limited
- Partnership allows faster deployment than full custom build
Scores are weighted across 7 dimensions. Adjust inputs to stress-test your decision before committing to a path.
Build
Your use case is genuinely proprietary, the data is too sensitive to share with a vendor, your internal team has AI engineering capability, and this is a long-term competitive differentiator that justifies the investment.
- Timeline: 6–18 months to production
- Budget: High upfront, lower marginal cost at scale
- Risk: Execution risk. Needs strong delivery governance
- Upside: Maximum customisation, full IP ownership, no vendor lock-in
Buy
The use case is relatively standard, you need results quickly, your internal team doesn't have AI engineering capacity, and the function is not a primary competitive differentiator. The market already has good solutions.
- Timeline: 4–12 weeks to go-live
- Budget: Predictable SaaS/platform licensing costs
- Risk: Vendor lock-in, data governance, customisation ceiling
- Upside: Proven, fast, low internal overhead
Partner
The use case is specific enough to need customisation but your internal team doesn't have sufficient AI expertise, budget is constrained, or you need to move faster than a full build allows. A systems integrator or specialist vendor brings the expertise while you retain ownership.
- Timeline: 8–20 weeks depending on scope
- Budget: Project-based; moderate upfront, ongoing support cost
- Risk: Partner dependency, knowledge transfer critical
- Upside: Faster than build, more custom than buy, builds internal capability over time